Author
|
Thread |
|
|
Sparky
Joined: 08 Dec 2003
Posts: 19080
Location: PDX6/9/17 9:39 AM |
Seems, as some expected, we are back to a very similar Niconesque progression.
|
|
![Send e-mail Send e-mail](templates/phpVB2/images/icon_email.gif) |
|
|
|
|
|
Sparky
Joined: 08 Dec 2003
Posts: 19080
Location: PDX6/13/17 2:05 AM |
And even more so IME after hearing Trump is considering firing Mueller.
The 'cabinet meeting' wreaked like one of the Sadam cabinet meetings i recall. Yes, oh fearless leader, i am blessed to serve you. I puked in my mouth frankly..
Last edited by Sparky on 6/13/17 2:31 PM; edited 1 time in total
|
|
![Send e-mail Send e-mail](templates/phpVB2/images/icon_email.gif) |
|
|
|
|
|
JohnC
Joined: 10 Jan 2004
Posts: 1939
Location: Glastonbury, Ct6/13/17 1:42 PM |
Cabinet meeting
I thought of Louis the Fourteenth. He seems to think he was elected King.
I'm not sure there's anything to the speculation about firing Mueller. The only one who has said anything publicly is Chris Ruddy, head of right-wing news outlet Newsmax. He's a buddy of Trump, but he may have just been shooting off his mouth to get some attention. This morning at the Senate Appropriations Committee, Deputy AG Rosenstein said he's the only one who can fire Mueller, and he sees no reason to do that, which means Trump would have to fire him first -- so we're talking full-scale Saturday Night Massacre.
But it's never entirely safe to predict what Trump will or won't do.
|
|
![Send e-mail Send e-mail](templates/phpVB2/images/icon_email.gif) |
|
|
|
|
|
KerryIrons
Joined: 12 Jan 2004
Posts: 3236
Location: Midland, MI6/13/17 2:20 PM |
Chaff
quote:
But it's never entirely safe to predict what Trump will or won't do.
A lot of what he says (whether consciously or not is an open question) it just chaff to distract his opponents or possible negotiating partners. The most recent and painful example is the "tapes" joke. Now he says he'll tell us in a week or two whether there are "tapes". Normally one would ask "Is this some kind of joke?" but of course in Trump's case, it's not a joke.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dan emery
Joined: 11 Jan 2004
Posts: 6890
Location: Maine6/13/17 2:30 PM |
C'mon Kerry
It's entirely rational - he has to decide whether to delete them before telling us if he has them...
Actually I'm pretty sure he doesn't have them - last thing he'd want.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April
Joined: 13 Dec 2003
Posts: 6593
Location: Westchester/NYC6/13/17 8:05 PM |
quote:
I'm not sure there's anything to the speculation about firing Mueller. The only one who has said anything publicly is Chris Ruddy, head of right-wing news outlet Newsmax. He's a buddy of Trump, but he may have just been shooting off his mouth to get some attention.
Oh Trump is shooting off HIS mouth, before realizing it back fired.
|
|
![Send e-mail Send e-mail](templates/phpVB2/images/icon_email.gif) |
|
|
|
|
|
JohnC
Joined: 10 Jan 2004
Posts: 1939
Location: Glastonbury, Ct6/14/17 9:49 AM |
Re firing Mueller: the NYTimes is reporting today, citing unnamed inside sources (aka "leakers"), that Trump was pissed off about Mueller's appointment from the beginning, and has been fuming about how and when he could get rid of him. So far, Priebus and a few others have been able to convince him that any good that might come of that would be far outweighed by the shitstorm of obstruction charges that it would bring down on the White House.
|
|
![Send e-mail Send e-mail](templates/phpVB2/images/icon_email.gif) |
|
|
|
|
|
Brian Nystrom
Joined: 26 Jan 2004
Posts: 5101
Location: Nashua, NH6/14/17 11:13 AM |
It would also lead to a mass defection...
...of Republicans in Congress, considering how many are teetering on the brink at the moment.
Trump still doesn't seem to have figured out that he can't intimidate elected representatives into doing what he wants, nor can he just fire anyone at will. He has very little control over anything at this point and that must be frustrating him to no end.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April
Joined: 13 Dec 2003
Posts: 6593
Location: Westchester/NYC6/14/17 2:34 PM |
But he clearly succeeded in intimidating his own white house staff, including his VP!
That cabinet meeting was the most nauseating display of the result of intimidation seen live on TV. Remember I came from China, where the intimidation comes in the form of labor camps. Even there, I haven't seen nearly as blatant show of "loyalty" from his cabinet, including from that very "republican ray of hope" Pence!
I guess because unlike the elected representatives, these guys CAN be fired by Trump. They're too scared to speak up against him.
|
|
![Send e-mail Send e-mail](templates/phpVB2/images/icon_email.gif) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sparky
Joined: 08 Dec 2003
Posts: 19080
Location: PDX6/14/17 4:09 PM |
Not sure whom, but it seems someone is suggesting the GOP Cabinet/men wear lipstick...
|
|
![Send e-mail Send e-mail](templates/phpVB2/images/icon_email.gif) |
|
|
|
|
|
Brian Nystrom
Joined: 26 Jan 2004
Posts: 5101
Location: Nashua, NH6/15/17 4:53 AM |
Who cares about his cabinet?
He probably doesn't listen to them and they don't get to vote on legislation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PLee
Joined: 08 Dec 2003
Posts: 3713
Location: Brooklyn, NY6/15/17 7:39 AM |
Given the number of cabinet members who are super-rich, I would have thought that they would have been more independent. It's not as if they need their jobs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brian Nystrom
Joined: 26 Jan 2004
Posts: 5101
Location: Nashua, NH6/15/17 9:55 AM |
I guess it depends on their motivation
Did they take the job thinking that they would be able to influence legislation to further benefit them financially? If so, that's a strong incentive to try to stick around. I doubt that there is much altruism in that group.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|