CYCLINGFORUM.COM - Where Cyclists Talk Tech --- Return To Home

 

    Register FAQ'sSearchProfileLog In / Log Out

 

****

cyclingforum.com ****

HOMECLUBS | SPONSORS | FEATURESPHOTO GALLERYTTF DONORS | SHOP FOR GEAR

Return to CyclingForum Home Page CYCLING TECH TALK FORUM
          View posts since last visit

OT: origin of chinese "clone-ivation" culture?
 Goto page Previous  1, 2

Author Thread Post new topic Reply to topic
April
Joined: 13 Dec 2003
Posts: 6593
Location: Westchester/NYC

12/5/14 3:11 PM

But they don't need to build the best turbine engine or aircraft carriers.

All they have to do is hack into the command link and the game will be won.

Prior to WWII, the 'major power ' such as the US/UK and France build lots of great battleships. GGermanny and Japan could (or would) build anytthing even close to that. But instead, they build airplane that could sink the great battleships in matter of minutes. ;-)

 Reply to topic     Send e-mail

Jesus Saves
Joined: 16 Jun 2005
Posts: 1150
Location: South of Heaven

12/5/14 3:30 PM

All (Chinese) hands on deck

Good point, April! China can apply a very simple, no-tech, kamikaze way to sink great battleships.....with a billion and a half population, it has enough of a recruit pool to storm, overtake, and sink a ship with the weight of its troops. If you think that is a crazy idea, keep in mind it is a somewhat frequent occurrence (sadly accidental) with ferry ships in the Philippines and Indonesia.

 Reply to topic    

walter
Joined: 11 Jan 2004
Posts: 4391
Location: metro-motown-area

12/5/14 8:55 PM

nation-state hacking, other gee-whiz stuff

that's an interesting thing. china has an <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PLA_Unit_61398" target="_blank">official military unit</a> specifically created to hack into western governments and companies to steal technical data, and probably leave nefarious trojan-horses and back-doors so they can continue monitoring and appropriating data as needed. of course the government denies it, even though the building exists and a unit-patch even exists.

hard for me to get worked up over it, since the US and other western powers do the very same thing. google <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stuxnet" target="_blank">stuxnet</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duqu" target="_blank">duqu</a>. of course the US denies, as well. but we dont deny the existence of the NSA, so at least we're (somewhat) forthright about it.

ive read that the US has validated against non-friendly nations the ability to use modern digital, phased array radar systems to actually "insert code" and take over an adversary's radar systems and make them see/do whatever they like. that's pretty cool star-trek-like stuff!

speaking of star-trek, the US also something called the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Active_Denial_System" target="_blank">active denial system</a>. it's basically a directional microwave oven that beams the energy at your adversary's troops -- a sort of "phaser" set to stun. non-lethal when used in moderation, it causes a very strong feeling of overheating, as you'd expect. the neat thing is that it can "sneak thru" gaps and around corners, so if a bad-guy is hiding behind something you can still zap them. there's no secrecy around the system, so i'm sure russia and china and israel have their own versions.

 Reply to topic     Send e-mail

April
Joined: 13 Dec 2003
Posts: 6593
Location: Westchester/NYC

12/5/14 9:48 PM


quote:
hard for me to get worked up over it, since the US and other western powers do the very same thing.

Like the battleship in WWII that was well past its usefulness, a lot of military hardware of today is of questionable usefulness in a full scale war in the coming decades.

The public don't have the stomach to learn about the truth on stuxnet and such. But they'll gladly fund the billion dollar hardware they can see and touch.

Sad.

 Reply to topic     Send e-mail

walter
Joined: 11 Jan 2004
Posts: 4391
Location: metro-motown-area

12/5/14 10:25 PM

"questionable usefulness in a full scale war"

That has been true since 06 Aug 1945, but for different reasons ...

 Reply to topic     Send e-mail

PLee
Joined: 08 Dec 2003
Posts: 3713
Location: Brooklyn, NY

12/8/14 10:39 AM

It's also one thing to have access to the machinery and quite another thing to know how to fabricate them. Turbine engines are a prime example. You can hold a turbine blade in your hand, be able to test it to see how strong it is, but have no idea how to fabricate it to have such strength, internal cooling passages, wear prevention coatings, etc. And THAT's where the real magic lies . . .

 Reply to topic    

April
Joined: 13 Dec 2003
Posts: 6593
Location: Westchester/NYC

12/8/14 11:30 AM

that's where the hacking comes into play... ratio of alloys, recipe for the coating, etc.

 Reply to topic     Send e-mail

walter
Joined: 11 Jan 2004
Posts: 4391
Location: metro-motown-area

12/8/14 1:35 PM

in the words of (fictional) Dr. Malcom


quote:
"...Um, I'll tell you the problem with the scientific power that you're using here, it didn't require any discipline to attain it. You read what others had done and you took the next step. You didn't earn the knowledge for yourselves, so you don't take any responsibility for it. You stood on the shoulders of geniuses to accomplish something as fast as you could, and before you even knew what you had, you patented it, and packaged it, and slapped it on a plastic lunchbox, and now..."

 Reply to topic     Send e-mail


Return to CyclingForum Home Page CYCLING TECH TALK FORUM
           View New Threads Since My Last Visit VIEW THREADS SINCE MY LAST VISIT
           Start a New Thread

 Display posts from previous:   


Goto page Previous  1, 2  
Last Thread | Next Thread  >  

  
  

 


If you enjoy this site, please consider pledging your support

cyclingforum.com - where cyclists talk tech
Cycling TTF Rides Throughout The World

Cyclingforum is powered by SYNCRONICITY.NET in Denver, Colorado -

Powered by phpBB: Copyright 2006 phpBB Group | Custom phpCF Template by Syncronicity