CYCLINGFORUM.COM - Where Cyclists Talk Tech --- Return To Home

 

    Register FAQ'sSearchProfileLog In / Log Out

 

****

cyclingforum.com ****

HOMECLUBS | SPONSORS | FEATURESPHOTO GALLERYTTF DONORS | SHOP FOR GEAR

Return to CyclingForum Home Page CYCLING TECH TALK FORUM
          View posts since last visit

Campag Ergo shifter 10->11 conversion possible?
 

Author Thread Post new topic Reply to topic
Nick Payne
Joined: 10 Jan 2004
Posts: 2626
Location: Canberra, Australia

1/29/14 12:06 AM

Campag Ergo shifter 10->11 conversion possible?

In the past I've changed a 9s Ergo shifter to a 10s shifter by replacing just the the ring and G springs inside the lever. Is it possible to change 10s Ergo shifter to 11s by the same method? I have a pair of ~ten year old Record 10s Ergo levers in good condition that I was thinking of converting if it is possible to do so. The existing chain and cassette are at the point of needing replacement, and I figured that if I only need to replace a part inside the shifter, then it's a real cheap conversion to 11s. I don't believe the bullshit from the manufacturers that you have to change the crankset and derailleurs as well...

Unfortunately, from a quick bit of Googling, it seems that from 2009 onwards, Campag changed the guts of their levers so that both 10s and 11s from that date aren't compatible with older levers, and they don't offer a part that would enable older 10s to be converted to 11s in the way that 9s could be converted to 10s.

OTOH, I can buy brand new Chorus 11s Ergo shifters from Wiggle for under $250, or Athena for under $200, which means that stuffing around with converting a lever is hardly worth it, even if it were possible.

 Reply to topic    

Dave B
Joined: 10 Jan 2004
Posts: 4511
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

1/29/14 8:17 AM

I'm no Campy expert but I believe you are right that they made a major change in their shifter internals about 2009, eliminating the G-springs and changing the front shifters to have fewer trim positions.

Chorus and Record retained the micro-shift front shifting but with the reduced number oftrim positions from 9 to 6 (called UltraShift) while Centaur and below have Shimano-like one-click front shifting with only one intermediate trim position (called PowerShift). Actually the more limited front shifting for Centaur and lower came about in 2007.

AFAIK these redesigned Ergos are not at all cross compatible with earlier versions and the PowerShift Ergos are not triple crank compatible but the UltraShift models are.

 Reply to topic     Send e-mail

dddd
Joined: 11 Jan 2004
Posts: 3345
Location: NorCal

1/29/14 11:13 AM

For some reason, I've always had a much more-difficult time keeping track of these shifter changes with Campagnolo vs. Shimano's STI shifters, not that Shimano's are really serviceable or upgradable and with the caveat tha Shimano's triples could have interchangeability issues across gruppos...

There often just seems to be greater difficulty digging up the needed doc's with anything that's Italian in origin, remembering back a few years to a discussion on whether ITM or TTT was 26.0 or 25.8mm, not that it was a big difference.

It makes me wonder how much it follows the corporate goal of planned obsolescence.

 Reply to topic    

Brian Nystrom
Joined: 26 Jan 2004
Posts: 5101
Location: Nashua, NH

1/30/14 6:35 AM

I've had the opposite issue

Not only has it been more difficult to find information on servicing Shimano shifters, but the parts are basically impossible to get. One reason I refuse to buy their stuff is their attitude of "If it breaks or wears out, throw it away and buy a new one." That's worse than planned obsolescence, as it applies to current products.

I've never has trouble finding Campy information online and in general, the parts are available. The same is true of SRAM. That's one key reason that these guys get my money.

 Reply to topic    

Dave B
Joined: 10 Jan 2004
Posts: 4511
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

1/30/14 7:01 AM

The only really non-serviceable Shimano parts that matter are the brifters and they are generally pretty durable in my experience.

Campy Ergos, are serviceable but they have obsoleted many designs and the older parts supply dried up quick enough that they aren't a long term purchase anyway.

I've never used SRAM and I'm not aware if their Double Tap brifters are serviceable and whether parts and service information are available. Apparently they are from what you say.

 Reply to topic     Send e-mail

ErikS
Joined: 19 May 2005
Posts: 8337
Location: Slowing boiling over in the steamy south, Global Warming is real

1/30/14 7:25 AM

From what I can tell they are serviceable.

I have noticed a trend on the net of the right brifters gutting themselves and being repaired.

 Reply to topic     Send e-mail

Brian Nystrom
Joined: 26 Jan 2004
Posts: 5101
Location: Nashua, NH

1/31/14 6:37 AM

-

dp

Last edited by Brian Nystrom on 1/31/14 6:45 AM; edited 1 time in total

 Reply to topic    

Brian Nystrom
Joined: 26 Jan 2004
Posts: 5101
Location: Nashua, NH

1/31/14 6:45 AM

SRAM gear is definitely serviceable

You can download service manuals and parts lists from their site and the parts are available from multiple sources. They also have a number of good videos on servicing various products.

As for Campy, I've found that you can generally find parts for anything that's less than 10 years old, though many older parts are available. Common maintenance parts, like the springs for the shifters, are common across many models and generations, so they're not hard to find.

You can't get parts for Shimano stuff when it's new and in production, let alone for older models. Considering that the brifters are the most expensive component on most bikes and are commonly damaged in crashes, it truly sucks that you cannot buy parts for them. Just say "Shima-NO!" ;-)

 Reply to topic    

Dave B
Joined: 10 Jan 2004
Posts: 4511
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

1/31/14 9:41 AM


quote:
Considering that the brifters are the most expensive component on most bikes and are commonly damaged in crashes....

I expect a brifter damaged in a crash isn't going to be fixed with just a replacement spring or small internal part. Campy tends to price their repair parts so high that, for extensive damage, it's probably just as attractive to replace the whole thing.

 Reply to topic     Send e-mail

April
Joined: 13 Dec 2003
Posts: 6593
Location: Westchester/NYC

1/31/14 9:57 AM


quote:
I expect a brifter damaged in a crash isn't going to be fixed with just a replacement spring or small internal part.

No, there's no telling which bits gets demaged in a crash. I recently "repaired" (i.e. made functionaal) a demaged Shimano brifter. I'm pretty sure Shimano didn't designed it to be repairable. But I did manage it anyway.

I think what you mean is parts that tend to wear out ought to be repairable which I agree whole-heartedly. Though on this point, both Campy and Shimano are doing an excellent job. Both brifters are super reliable. I've had minor crash with both kind and both are still quite functional.

My Campy setup is now on year 16 of their service, almost always on my primary bike. Yes, it's showing signs of wear. And I do have the option of having it rebuild for potentialy another 16 years of service. But to be honest, I'm beginning to wonder if I should think about moving into the right century with my bike equipment...

 Reply to topic     Send e-mail


Return to CyclingForum Home Page CYCLING TECH TALK FORUM
           View New Threads Since My Last Visit VIEW THREADS SINCE MY LAST VISIT
           Start a New Thread

 Display posts from previous:   


  
Last Thread | Next Thread  >  

  
  

 


If you enjoy this site, please consider pledging your support

cyclingforum.com - where cyclists talk tech
Cycling TTF Rides Throughout The World

Cyclingforum is powered by SYNCRONICITY.NET in Denver, Colorado -

Powered by phpBB: Copyright 2006 phpBB Group | Custom phpCF Template by Syncronicity